Tyrone responds to residents’ suit over gun shop

A recent suit brought by eight Southampton subdivision residents and one business owner in the adjacent Southampton Village shopping center has received a response from Tyrone over a rezoning that allowed a proposed gun shop and indoor shooting range to locate in the retail center.

In the response town attorney Dennis Davenport included three defense statements. The first noted that the residents in their filing failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

The second defense stated that, “To the extent plaintiff is seeking any damages from the Town of Tyrone, defendants raise the defense that plaintiffs’ claims are or may be barred in whole or in part by the doctrines of sovereign, governmental, qualified and official immunity.”

Portions of the third defense position responds to the residents’ assertion that their residential or business property will be substantially affected by the presence of the gun shop and shooting range under the rezoning. Also included in the third defense was the response to residents’ assertion that adjacent property owners will bear the brunt of the negative impacts from the presence of the gun shop and shooting range. Those negative impacts include reduced property values, noise, potential lead contamination in the neighborhood and intrusions of peace and privacy.

The town’s position is that plaintiffs do not have the standing to challenge the zoning because they, “Do not have a substantial interest in the zoning decisions and cannot show that their property will suffer special damage as a result of the (zoning) decisions.”

The response also denies that the residents are the owners of property adjacent to the subject property and denies that they will suffer a negative impact. Additionally, the response states that alleged damages are speculative and not sufficient to establish a standing for the complaint.

Plaintiffs in the suit include Southampton subdivision residents Leila Richardson, Wayne Mason, Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, Larry Bennet, Donna Ballard, Natalie Milner, Michelle Williams and Thomas Redd and Southampton Plaza shopping center business owner LaGuana Albarracin.

The suit filed April 2 by attorney Wayne Kendall is appealing the rezoning in March “approving the allowance of a gun shop as a conditional use in a C-2 (Commercial HIghway) zoning district and also the allowance of a shooting range as an accessory use to a gun shop on the subject property and seek(s) a declaratory judgment to declare these rezoning decisions to be a manifest abuse of rezoning power and therefore illegal and void.”

The vote at the May 3 meeting of the Tyrone Town Council over zoning changes that included guns shops as a conditional use of C-2 (Highway Commercial) zoning came with unanimous approval. The agenda topic was essentially a reconsideration of the previous zoning district change from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to C-2 and the inclusion of guns shops as a conditional use in C-2.

In a separate but associated matter, the Tyrone Neighborhood Association on May 4 filed a suit against Southampton Village property owner Phil Seay, that Atlanta Gun Club and the town of Tyrone over what the group says would be the dispersal of toxic material and lead dust particulate from ammunition if the gun shop and shooting range is opened. The suit claims the development of the property would violate a 1997 convenant agreement between Seay and the Southampton subdivision that restricts the introduction of hazardous materials in the shopping center property.

The town has not yet responded to the May 4 complaint.

Robert W. Morgan
Robert W. Morgan's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/26/2005
Mr. Kendall, you owe your clients an explanation

Actually 2:
1. They need to know how a frivolous lawsuit works. Especially the part about how they can be held responsible to personally reimburse Tyrone for all legal fees incurred by Tyrone. Did you mention this to them?
2. Proving a decline of property values in the middle of a general overall market decline? How you gonna do dat? Can you provide an example of a similar suit that actually succeeded? What are you going to use? Three Mile Island?

Look out Leila, Wayne, Gwen, Larry, Donna, Natalie and Tom. That light at the end of the tunnel is probably a train. Oh yea, ask your counselor what jointly and severally means when Tyrone gains the right to recover those legal fees.

winstonknows
winstonknows's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/25/2012
Now that's comedy

1) Noise? It is indoors, the slamming of a car door will be louder. Better sue LaGuana Albarracin while you are at it for attracting loud slamming doors.
2) Lead? Maybe to those using the range w/ you are mad at any way so why do you care. With proper ventilation/filtering you have nothing to worry about South Hampton.
3) Home Value? You will have more luck suing the POTUS for his role in cratering the economy and your home price.

*damnant quodnon intelligunt