On transit tax, Ga. is mimicking California

Our rally cry in metropolitan Atlanta should be, “Remember California!”

California, the lurching to the left state, announced a $16 billion deficit projection. Why should anyone be surprised?

Businesses are leaving the state in droves due to higher (soon to be higher still) taxes and excessive regulation costs. Likewise, personal income is going down, reducing income tax revenue.

Government spending and pandering to special interests in California at the state and local levels has been outrageous. The liberal Democrat machine is running the state in the ground.

Gov. Jerry Brown wants a massive commuter rail plan that several special state committees have begged him to abandon because to the enormous costs compared to the minimal benefit.

Metropolitan Atlanta leadership is heading into the same swamp because they find certain liberal ideas so appealing. They call it “being progressive” or “offering alternatives” but they cannot justify those positions in a cost-benefit analysis. Their ideas, they think, are worth pursing no matter what the cost.

Cobb County Commission Chairman Tim Lee, while speaking to the liberal Georgia Community Coalition, called his conservative constituents “spoiled brats.”

The “spoiled” conservative Cobb residents had the audacity to demand road projects in the Transportation Investment Act (known as “TSPLOST”) that would actually lessen traffic congestion. They refused to accept the multi-billion dollar boondoggle Cumberland-CID transit rail project that would provide little or no effect on traffic congestion.

At an Executive Committee meeting of the Regional Transportation Roundtable, Gwinnett County Commission Chairman Charlotte Nash, asked a very significant question about the half-funded transit projects in the July 31 TSPLOST referendum. She wondered if the sale tax was not approved for a second 10-year period, how would the projects be finished. After a moment of silence, the only answer offered was each individual local jurisdiction would have to pay the gigantic balances.

Part of the special interest-laden TSPLOST called for the construction of the $609 million Beltline transit rail project which also has nothing to do with relieving traffic congestion.

Here is what the Beltline does: “... a vehicle to restore 45 in-town neighborhoods and guide future development along a 22-mile loop of planned transit.” Does that sound like it is going to improve commute times to work and back? No, but it’s going to make the City of Atlanta a heck of a lot money at our expense.

And, so you will know, the general plan, one given the nod by the Metropolitan Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, regarding MARTA is eventually we all will be paying for it. DeKalb County CEO Burrell Ellis sums it up, “We need a regional [mass transit] system where everyone participates and everyone pays.” To clarify, “everyone” means every person living in the 10-county Atlanta region (that would be you).

Just like California, Fayette County has its share of special interest waste.

The Terri Smith and Janet Smola era on the Board of Education is the worst case of financial neglect in the board’s history. Although the financial pain is bad enough, other carnage will ensue like closing viable school buildings (some we paid millions of dollars to retrofit) and massive school redistricting because there are no students living near the empty new schools.

Things are not much better with the Board of Commissioners. The board has been rife with special interest goodies. The land speculators and developers now have their new phase I and phase II of the West Fayetteville Bypass.

The new early retirement package is beginning to smell quite bad. Would the majority on the board and senior staff benefitting from the plan really fight an independent review of the package if it was going to show that it saves the county millions of dollars?

There has never been a primary election like the one on July 31 that could end so many wrongs and prevent the continued waste of your tax dollars. It’s your money. Please mark your calendar to go vote.

Steve Brown

Fayette Commissioner, Post 4

Peachtree City, Ga.

ginga1414
ginga1414's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/01/2008
Regional T-SPLOST Debate

All South Metro (Atlanta, Ga.) Citizens are invited to hear the pros and the cons, in the form of a debate, concerning the upcoming Transportation Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax referred to as the T-SPLOST on Tuesday, June 5th at 6:30 pm. The debate will be held at the Harvest Christian Community Center (behind yellow Mexican Restaurant), 383 N. Glynn St. (Ga. Hwy. 85N) in Fayetteville.

This will be the best opportunity for the public to hear both sides of the issue so that when it is time to vote on July 31st we will all have the information we need to make a wise decision.

Fayette County Commissioner, Steve Brown and Bob Ross, Leader of the Fayette County Issues Tea Party have participated in four debates and made presentations throughout the 10 County Region pertaining to the Transportation Investment Act (Regional T-SPLOST).

Past debates have been very lively and filled with information. The Fayetteville debate will not be the exception.

The VP of Transportation for the Atlanta Chamber of Commerce and a representative of the Metro Atlanta Voter Education Network (MAVEN) will argue in favor of the sales tax increase. Brown and Ross wil argue against the T-SPLOST.

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
What does the Tea Party, NAACP and

and the Sierra Club have in common?????

They oppose the current T-SPLOST scheme.

Tea Party: A tax increase of up to 17%

Sierra Club: Does not do have enough have transit.

NAACP: It fails to serve enough African Americans.

ginga1414
ginga1414's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/01/2008
Congestion Adds How Much Commute Time?

In a May 24, 2012, Journal/Constitution article written by young conservative columnist Kyle Wingfield, the time that congestion adds to the average Atlanta Commute isn't very much.

Wingfield based his column on INRIX data. INRIX is a company in Washington state that compiles traffic data in America's one hundred largest urban areas, which includes metropolitan Atlanta.

Wingfield's article says, "Congestion adds less than six minutes to the average metro Atlanta commute. And to reduce -- not eliminate -- that six-minute problem, we are asked to tax ourselves an extra $7.2 billion in 10 years."

The article goes on to say, "the chief reason our commutes are so long is that so many of us live so far from our workplaces."

So, maybe we should be asking ourselves if we can afford to subsidize some folks' choices to live further distances from their work place.

mudcat
mudcat's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/26/2005
So, just leave 6 minutes earlier and everything will be fine

Politicians solving imaginary problems with huge amounts of money is very wasteful and unnecessary. If people don't like their commute, they will move or change jobs. If companies can't find qualified workers because of traffic congestion, they will offer higher wages, offer flex time, have people telecommute or simply lower their standards and hire slugs and try to train them. It all works out - no need to spend $7billion.

In other words people will adjust on their own without the heavy hand of government.

In fact you may get gentrification of neighborhoods that have good access to the existing MARTA lines, leading to a new slogan - Moving Achievers Rapidly To Atlanta - meaning so they can get to work on time. If we get enough of that, Atlanta will have a vibrant downtown area where people will actually want to live, take care of their property and provide a huge boost to neighborhood small businesses that don't have bars on their windows. Enough gentrification and even the voting patterns will change, which means there will be different people in charge of Atlanta government and even the Atlanta school system. Think of the defeat of the Transportation Sales Tax as the beginning of Atlanta cleansing itself and rising from the ashes.

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Online
Joined: 10/30/2005
Rising from the ashes?

Is that why more businesses are coming to Atlanta? Is that why Atlanta has one of the largest airports in the world?
Gentrification has started in Atlanta - as it has in many urban areas - but the young people moving in represent Americans - not necessarily all the same 'shade'. Gosh - only one 'shade' in this country represents success/achievement? And the GOP wonders why they can't get the Latino/Black vote? No racist here in this discussion. Everything based on fact - not desired fiction. (Now comes the 'inspired' facts showing that minorities in Atlanta have KILLED' that once marvelous city.) Yeah - right.

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Online
Joined: 10/30/2005
Ginga - food for thought

During this economic crisis - for many of us, every penny counts in our day to day lives. Could big business help us out of this six minute/$7.2 million dilemma by some creative business practices?

• Laddered start up hours
• More work from home assignments ( two or three days a week)
• Would the implementation of practices like the two mentioned above help with the traffic situation?

Many work in an urban area - but prefer, and make a sacrifice to raise their children in a suburban area.

I have observed workers in cubicles at a computer for 8 hours a day - and they could have been at that same computer at home.

There are some occupations where being on site is important. I remember when they tried to get teachers to 'car pool' in California - but teachers need their cars and independence for after school home visits; meetings; etc. There are professions where the individual needs their car. Even in the teachers situation - some creative scheduling did allow some teachers to car pool. Asking citizens to subsidize others for making a choice to live in the suburbs in this economic situation is not wisdom. There must be other answers for now. (It appears that adding to the rapid transit system is not the only answer at this time if we're only talking about a 6 minute relief) Just asking.

NUK_1
NUK_1's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/17/2007
Wow....seems like the TSPLOST might be OK!

When you have those 3 groups that care nothing whatsoever about anything besides their own special interests and are opposed to something, the TSPLOST must have some merit!

Ehhh...no, it doesn't sadly. This is one time when widely-divergent groups can all come together and unite around the basic premise of "this piece of legislation sucks," because it does indeed suck.

PTC Observer
PTC Observer's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2007
Notwithstanding - Nuk_1

that the politicians tried to set this up where it had the best chance of passing, the outrage over it may win the day in the end.

The key is that there has to be enough people that are outraged about it to overcome special interest groups like Mr. Drake's concrete consortium. I will be so bold as to predict that it will go down in defeat in most regions.

I also personally believe that if the tax passes, it won't do anything to eliminate the congestion on the roads, then of course they will be back to ask for even more money.

Both Ramsey and Chance supported this law.

ginga1414
ginga1414's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/01/2008
PTC, Westmoreland Does, Too

Lynn Westmoreland supports the Regional T-SPLOST, also.