The Fayette Citizen-News Page
Friday, November 13, 1998
Coweta road projects are endangered by environmental lawsuit

By SALLIE SATTERTHWAITE
Staff Writer

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Tuesday may go down in environmental history as the day the battle for clean air shifted to the court room.

In an unprecedented display of solidarity, three leading environmental advocacy groups announced that they are bringing suit against bureaucrats they claim are permitting illegal road construction to slip through a loophole in federal funding regulations.

Of 61 alleged improperly "grandfathered" projects, several are in Coweta County including:

· The widening of Ga. Highway 34 from White Oak Creek to Ga. Highway 154 and from Fischer Cross Road to Ga. Highway 74.

· The Interstate 85-Hwy. 34 ramp reconstruction project.

The Georgia Department of Transportation, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Atlanta Regional Commission were named in a 60-day "notice of intent" to be sued for "illegally approving $700 million in new road construction that will increase air pollution endangering the health of the citizens of the Atlanta region," according to a statement released in a press conference at the State Capitol Building.

This action is the first of its kind in the country and, if successful, will have long-term repercussions for transportation planning and for the economic and environmental health of American communities.

Joining in the suit are:

Georgians for Transportation Alternatives, Jim Chapman, executive director.

Sierra Club, Georgia Chapter, Bryan Hager, transportation organizer.

The Georgia Conservancy, Michael Halicki, communications director.

Wesley Woolf, director of the Deep South office of the Southern Environmental Law Center, is serving as legal counsel for plaintiffs.

Coweta County is one of the 13 metro counties in "non-attainment" of clean air standards developed under the Clean Air Act of 1990. Federal funding for road building is being denied the Atlanta region until it produces a plan and demonstrates a reduction in ground-level ozone production.

Or so it was intended. The suit argues that Georgia DOT, the U.S. DOT, and ARC violated federal law by approving 61 new road construction projects without sufficiently taking into account the impact of the additional traffic on the region's air quality. These projects, say the plaintiffs, should not move forward until they satisfy a long-range plan that reduces air pollution and traffic congestion problems plaguing the region.

The filing is the first citizen legal action nationwide to seek to enforce a key provision of the 1990 Clean Air Act that requires transportation projects to meet air quality standards for car and truck emissions a top public health threat in major U.S. cities. Its authors expect that this action in Atlanta, one of the country's most polluted and congested cities, could set a precedent for transportation planning in dozens of other urban areas.

"Citizens of the Atlanta region can't keep holding their breath waiting for the clean air that comes with smart transportation planning," said Wesley Woolf of the Southern Environmental Law Center, and legal counsel for the plaintiffs.

"One need only look at the sea of frustrated motorists stuck in traffic to understand that Atlanta's transportation system is not working," he said. "If our transportation leaders don't clean up their act, we will have no choice but to take them to court."

Georgia Conservancy's Michael Halicki, media contact for the announced filing, says that the "grandfathered" construction projects are equivalent to the building of one lane of new road stretching from Atlanta to Savannah.

"At the end of last year, [state and federal DOT and ARC] approved a whole series of road projects under grandfathering provisions," Halicki said. "The EPA and Georgia Conservancy were screaming bloody murder, but ARC ignored the outrage and passed it through anyway.

"We're not trying to say you shouldn't grandfather certain roads, in reasonable situations," he continued, "but we have come across $700 million put into grandfathering provisions that will make air pollution worse by ARC's own congestion analysis, they have identified areas where even by their own standards it will make it worse.

"The Atlanta region is one of a few non-attainment areas across the country without a long-range plan. We would like to see the whole action plan. When dealing with $700 million in projects not added into modeling schemes the ARC is developing, they are not really playing by the rules," Halicki said.

"Projects should not move forward without a plan to reach air quality goals."


What do you think of this story?
Click here to send a message to the editor. Click here to post an opinion on our Message Board, "The Citizen Forum"

Back to News Home Page | Back to the top of the page