PTC man wants rules for pit bull dogs

Fri, 11/13/2009 - 4:41pm
By: John Munford

Request comes from resident bitten by 2 dogs last year

A Peachtree City resident has asked the City Council to look into creating special requirements for owners of pit bull dogs.

Dan Brown wants the city to require pit bull dogs to be muzzled and held under leash by an able bodied person whenever the dog is on a public street, path, sidewalk, park or any public place in the city.

Brown also wants pit bull owners to obtain a special license from the city once a year, have proof of liability insurance for the animal up to $100,000 and be required to show proof of required vaccinations.

He is also asking the city to limit residents to owning no more than one pit bull within the city limits.

At the request of council, City Attorney Ted Meeker will look into the matter and prepare a recommendation for council at a later date. Brown provided Meeker with data on what other cities have adopted to regulate pit bulls.

If anybody has reason to be suspicious of pit bull dogs, it’s Brown. Last fall, Brown and his dog were attacked by two pit bulls that had escaped a fenced area. The attack happened near Flat Creek Golf Club west of north Peachtree Parkway.

Brown suffered puncture wounds to his leg, and police officers ultimately killed both pit bulls due to fear they would attack other people.

Brown and his golden retriever were also attacked a month ago by another pit bull dog, which was on a leash, on the cart path near the McDonald’s on Ga. Highway 54. Brown used pepper spray on the pit bull, which eventually left the area, he said.

login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 3:41pm.

Whats up with the dog park? My buddy is home visiting his mom and tried to take her dogs to the dog park. As it turns out its not free any more. Aparently there is a club you have to join and there is an extra $10 fee for out of county people. When did this happen?


Submitted by Spyglass on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 8:03pm.

How about an "Out of City Fee"?

Submitted by Citizen_Steve on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 6:39pm.

I've stopped going, the arrangement makes no sense. Maybe a dollar a dog for non-members would be fair. What a stupid idea, to make it a private club. Incorporate a 503c, elect a board - for a dog park? I cannot believe they actually did it. I mean, it's a dog park! And a really lame one at that, they took out about every tree. What nonsense, it's doomed to failure.

Submitted by normal on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 5:08pm.

That takes money. Since all governments are broke they have to get it somewhere. If you take a dog to the park you should pay. Nothing is free. Out of county people should not be at this dog park. Keep your mutts home.

matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 3:18pm.

What upkeep? Its a fenced in area in the middle of the woods with mulch on the ground. There is no way that park costs more to maintain than any other park in town. Why don't we just extend this club to cover all the parks in town and then fence off every park and only allow them to be used by people with membership passes? I don't think this issue is really about money. I think the issue is that the people who volunteered to build the park are a bunch of control freaks who do not want to share there park.


zoes's picture
Submitted by zoes on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 3:29pm.

www.ptcdogpark.com

It isn't funded in any way by the city or taxpayers. It does take upkeep and maintenance and work. It has a limited base of volunteers and needed a way to stay a nice place, so they implemented the fee.

ZoeS

"Never love anything that can't love you back."


Submitted by Citizen_Steve on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 5:07pm.

Upkeep, right. The association overhead likely exceeds the cost of upkeep. My dog doesn't care about your PO Box and Officer & Director insurance.

Your annual membership fee helps us pay for:
- Post Office Box
- Non-Profit fee with GA Sec. of State
- Website fees
- Liability insurance
- Director & Officer insurance
- Poop bags
- Fence and general maintenance
- Equipment rental (if needed)
- Reserve fund for emergencies
===================
$3,200 total expenses

Submitted by PTCGOIL on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 6:39pm.

But trewwwwww......Woooff...woooff..Bowwww...Wowwwwwie!!!!!

matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 3:18pm.

..


Submitted by PTCGOIL on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 4:35pm.

If what matt.barnes says is true, they dogs are pissed they don't have their free park anymore! So, they do what dogs do when they are mad. They BITE people!

Only people could screw this up for dogs. They just want a place to go and play and sniff and pee and poo and act like a dog and now it's been taken away??? Can you blame them? They must be howling mad!Smiling

SPQR's picture
Submitted by SPQR on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 12:29pm.

There is a syndrome called compensation. Men who are small in stature or other ways sometimes compensate with things such as large or threatening dogs. Others just either don't care or refuse to recognize they are putting others at risk.


Submitted by Bonkers on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 1:05pm.

Or grow a mustache or buy a Harley or a Corvette.

Gene61's picture
Submitted by Gene61 on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 2:40am.

Every 40 seconds, someone in the United States seeks medical attention for a dog bite.

There are approximately 800,000 bites per year in the United States that require medical treatment.
Most of the victims are children, and most of them are bitten on the face.

Almost $165 million is spent treating dog bites and 70% of dog bites occur on the owner's property.

Dog bites result in approximately 44,000 facial injuries each year. This represents between 0.5% and 1.5% of all hospital emergency room visits. Male patients slightly outnumber females. Unfortunately children comprise 60% of the dog bite victims. Severe injuries occur almost exclusively in children less than 10 years of age. The face is the most frequent target (77% of all injures). Mail carriers are an exception where 97% involve the lower extremities. We see an unusual number of dreadful injuries each spring. Severely injured patients stay an average of 4.2 days in the hospital. Dog bites cause an average of 18 deaths a year.

Among the deadliest and most vicious of all dog breeds with killer instincts, originally bred to fight and kill other dogs, Pit Bulls are now widely popular as companion dogs, especially in American cities. Their popularly is strange given their homicidal history and aggressive in-bred traits, but that is seemingly part of the appeal. With its powerful jaws, thick skull and muscular legs the American Pit Bull Terrier (and related breeds) makes short work of children and adults it attacks often maiming them for life. The very name "pit bull" is used in our language to signify a singularly tenacious state of being.

This breed is variously cited as being responsible for nearly a third of all fatal dog attacks in the United States, in part due to its tenacity in a fight. Pit bulls cause one-third of dog-bite related fatalities while only make up less than 2% of the dog population. Because of the deaths, maulings and serious injuries inflicted by Pit Bulls, many countries worldwide ban these dogs altogether or require licenses for ownership of them. In response to many high profile maulings and fatal attacks by Pit Bulls, many US cities and towns have specifically targeted the breed with legislation restricting ownership and increasing penalties on owners for attacks made by their Pit Bulls. Pit Bulls are often responsible for attacking and killing other dog breeds as well as cats and small pets.

Police officers often need to shoot and kill this breed in order to subdue it after attacks on humans or other animals in US cities. In recent years several owners of these dogs in the United States have been criminally prosecuted in homicide cases. Sadly, many of the owners of these deadly dogs do not possess insurance and the maimed victims go uncompensated. Apologists for these vicious dogs abound online, but facts are facts. These dogs have little or no business being pets in anyone's household they are simply too aggressive and dangerous.

http://www.dog-bite-law-center.com/pgs/stats.html


matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 4:12pm.

Your statistics do not take in account the demmographics of the owners of Pit-Bulls. There are is a lot of white trash and ghetto rats out there who get Pit Bulls because of there potential to be mean and then raise them to be that way. Beacause of this I cannot blame the breed. Just like any other dog given the propoer amount of love I still feel that pits can be good dogs. However, I do agree with the mandatory 100k insurance policy for two reasons. 1. Because of some of the stories on this blog explaining there unpredictablity. I own a Pit Bull. First she was my wife's dog and now she is ours. Our dog also holds a higher level of emotional attachment to us because my wife and I might because of that dog. 2. I agree with the insurance because I think that a lot of the bad people who make Pit Bulls bad dogs are low-income people and the mandatory insurance (which hopefully they will not be able to afford) will force these people to choose between living in PTC and owning a pit. Either way the good people in PTC win. I don't like the muzzle part but wil be happy to insure my dog if it helps drive bad people out of town.


dawn69's picture
Submitted by dawn69 on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 4:44pm.

For the first 10 years of marriage, my husband worked third shift. So our pit had always been used to sleeping with me. When my husband finally landed day shift, it became a HUGE power struggle over who was going to sleep on that side of the bed - hubby or Hershey. While my vote was for hubby - Hershey had issues with that. We eventually had to shut him out of the room altogether, with him clawing and growling. I believe that is why it was my husband who was attacked by the dog. Hershey felt that his territory had been encroached upon.

"The most beautiful things in life cannot be seen or even touched, they must be felt with the heart." - Helen Keller


matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 4:55pm.

It took me 3yrs to get our dog to sleep on the floor. That dog loves my wife and she loves me. I can't imagine Weebles attacking me but I can take it if it comes down to it. For now I'll just be be more careful.


Gene61's picture
Submitted by Gene61 on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 2:37am.

My opinion, Ban them...


cyclecircuit's picture
Submitted by cyclecircuit on Sat, 11/14/2009 - 7:15pm.

I disagree with most of the comments that have been published here. Owners are responsible to keep their animals under control and no amount of laws will protect any one from any animal that is left unsupervised. There are laws that cover all dogs not just a speciic breeds here: http://www.fayettecountyga.gov/animal_control/animal_control_laws.htm
Ban or kill all you want, next time it will be some other non-discript breed, killer bees, ferall cats, wild eyed oposum, take your pick. Learn to recognize the hazards around you and take steps to protect you and yours usings the laws and tools already in place.


Submitted by Davids mom on Sat, 11/14/2009 - 7:35pm.

Someday a person will have fear of a cocker or a collie and want to put them asleep! Keep dogs under law-abiding supervision!

Submitted by mar66cla on Sat, 11/14/2009 - 10:17am.

Pit Bulls are unpredictable, you never know when they are going to snap. I say ban them completely. Might as well have a crocodile in your back yard.

Submitted by CombatCorrespondent on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 10:31am.

mar66cla wrote:
"Ban Pit Bulls Completely
Submitted by mar66cla on Sat, 11/14/2009 - 10:17am.
Pit Bulls are unpredictable, you never know when they are going to snap. I say ban them completely."

UNTRAINED and UNSUPERVISED dogs of ANY breed are unpredictable. Rather than attack the breed, we should be attacking the irresponsible dog owners (of all breeds) with criminal and civil action, who allow their dogs to roam freely or who cannot control their dogs on leash.

As a professional dog trainer, my wife and I notice dog owners all the time with out of control dogs on and off leash. And not just pitbulls. A five year old child holding the leash of a Great Dane (or any large dog) is neither cute or responsible.

A study was done in Great Britain in the 1990's that showed despite banning Pitbulls, the number of dog bites did not go down.

Here is a link to some great information that looks at dog bite statistics:

http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/statistics.html

We need to train the owners to train their dogs. Dog owners who repeatedly allow their dogs to roam freely or out of control in public, need to be dealt with using the laws that are already on the books.

I personally don't care for Pitbulls, but I would not move to ban them or restrict them any more so than any other breed. If we ban them, next we will be banning any other breed that bites someone. Where does it end?

And who is to be the one to determine if a dog is really a Pitbull? An American Staffordshire Terrier or a Boxer can look like a "Pitbull". There are other breeds that have similar looks and can be confused with a Pitbull. Do we ban those dogs too? No reputable registry (AKC/FCI) recognizes the Pitbull as a legitimate breed. So, who would be the final authority of determining what is a "Pitbull"?

Many people do not even know that the Fayette County Recreation Department offers a 10 week dog obedience training class that is taught by professional and experienced trainers. It's $85!

http://www.fayettecountyga.gov/parks_and_recreation/brochure/fall09/Fall%202009.pdf

I'm sorry the gentleman was bitten by these dogs, but I think he should be seeking relief against the owners of the dogs that bit him through the courts and not through bans on certain breeds.

I say lets act with reason and assign blame and responsibilty where it should be. And that would be with the owners of the dogs that have bitten.

Unfortunately, at the end of the day, the dogs will have to pay with their lives for their owners ignorance, arrogance and irresponsibilty.

Submitted by normal on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 6:57pm.

The only good pit bull is a dead pit bull. Euthanasia is the game. Just a short drive to the vet.

matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 7:56pm.

Its not the breed its the owners. I have a Pit Bull mix, she is great with my friends and my friends kids.


muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 8:52am.

I think this rejoinder--"It's not the breed; it's the owner"--is only partially true.

I knew Trish McConnell in grad school, whose NPR call-in show, Calling All Pets, deals with behavior problems in pets. (She also has several books on the topic.) Trish raised and trained border collies on her Wisconsin farm, and they were keenly attuned to her commands. I was impressed that Trish's dogs ran free on the property and had no need of fences. She had taught them their boundaries, and they did not dare cross them.

Nevertheless, there are features of the breed that are hardwired in.
Show me a border collie and I'll show you a dog that is genetically programmed to display a canine version of obsessive compulsive disorder. This makes it the more remarkable that Trish could even get her collies to sit still for more than 30 seconds!

Similarly, pit bulls are hardwired, as a result of selective breeding, with a predisposition for aggression--particularly towards dogs and other animals. I suppose it is possible, with the correct training and rearing, to produce a pit bull with good and predictable behavior as Trish did with her collies. But not everyone has the dog training wisdom of a Trish McConnell. And though there are of course important exceptions to this, the breed seems to be attractive to owners who value their aggressive reputation. It is simply true that there is a greater probability of an attack involving a pit bull than with most other breeds.

My wife's sister owned a pit bull years ago. He seemed very friendly and was around the extended family, including children, quite a bit. But one day he decided to attack her two-year-old nephew and bit him very badly in the face. No one saw it coming.


Submitted by Bonkers on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 12:56pm.

I was raised on a large farm with cattle, sheep, horses, etc.
There were also outside dogs. We fed these dogs and had no trouble personally with them, however they had their vicious nature. They were mostly collie mix.
One of the dogs jobs was to herd the milk cows out of the back pastures at milking time. He would nip their heels to get them to move. If they gave him a hard time he would swing on the end of their tails with his teeth.
He also joined a dog pack and killed several sheep. We shot him.

Then, certain cows and horses act like mean bulls also! One cow tried to run down and butt every small kid they saw. One young horse tried to run away with everything he was hooked up to.

The point is that domesticated animals are only domesticated so far as they have been trained and then only for many things----not all.
They have no fear of jail.
Leave a cat his claws and you will regret it!

dawn69's picture
Submitted by dawn69 on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 4:30pm.

Some are just plain mean. I once rode a horse like that. Apache was a two year old pinto and every bit an asshole - but he was only like that with me. Everyone else rode him without incident, but when I climbed aboard he bolted and bucked. Yep, he was an asshole!!

most beautiful things in life cannot be seen or even touched, they must be felt with the heart." - Helen Keller


hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 5:27pm.

Apache seems to have a lot in common with Bonker$.

I yam what I yam....Popeye


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 4:48pm.

As kid, I had a couple of desert tortoises. And they acted just like those horses; you know bolting around and stuff. Smiling
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


carbonunit52's picture
Submitted by carbonunit52 on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 10:20am.

Regarding pit bulls, that statement would be true only when it was the owner that did the biting. The only safe pit bull is a dead pit bull.

It's not easy being the carbonunit


dawn69's picture
Submitted by dawn69 on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 10:16am.

We had a pit/lab mix for 11 years. We adopted him from the pound as a puppy and were told that he was a lab puppy. As he grew it became evident, and the vet confirmed, that he was a pit bull mix. For 11 years we loved that dog and for 11 years I defended pits. Then came the day when he turned on my family, attacking my husband and giving him six bites. We had no choice but to put down our beloved pet. If he would not heal to his 250 pound 6 foot master, then the children were not safe.

Two years later, I am still in shock over the incident and still grieving over my dog. But now we have another rescue dog... a loving black lab that loves the whole family (especially my son). He waits at the front door for the kids to get home from school, he sleeps with my son until he falls asleep and then goes to my daughters room until she falls asleep. The only odd thing about him is that he is the only lab in the whole world that is TERRIFIED of water. Smiling

"The most beautiful things in life cannot be seen or even touched, they must be felt with the heart." - Helen Keller


Submitted by bornfree on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 8:56pm.

bornfree My family moved to PTC over 24 years ago. If I am not
mistaken, at that time there was a leash law that stated that ALL
Dogs would be required to be on a leash, no exceptions. Is it true
that this law was changed and if so when? I understand that it is
now okay to have them under voice control....yeah, right.

Submitted by AtHomeGym on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 9:27pm.

I thought the County Leash Law applied to all dogs and all owners in the entire County. I do not believe it has been changed. Does someone know different?

zoes's picture
Submitted by zoes on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 11:31am.

The County Leash Law applies to all dogs AND CATS.

ZoeS

"Never love anything that can't love you back."


matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 9:25pm.

I'm not sure if you were replying to my post or not but I agree there is a leash law and it should be followed. I was just commenting that I own a pit bull and she is a very nice dog and gentle dog who loves people. I shouldn't be held responsible for other peoples mistakes. I'm sorry that this guy got attacked twice in one year but with the exception of Mr. Brown how many people were attacked by pit bulls in PTC last year?


WakeUp's picture
Submitted by WakeUp on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 9:38am.

We are held responsible for other's mistakes all the time. I have never shot anyone with a machine gun, but they are heavily regulated. I can't go to ACE Hardware and buy dynamite, even though I have never bombed someone. I can't drive 90 mph down the interstate even though I have never had a crash I was charged with. I can't even carry a small pocket knife with me on an airplane even though I have never tried to hijack one. So, get over it. We suffer for other people mistakes every day. Now, find another point to justify having these dastardly dogs.


Submitted by USArmybrat on Sat, 11/14/2009 - 1:40am.

You are right that you should not be held responsible for another's actions, but you have to realize that the statistics are not exactly in favor of your breed. I believe that pit bulls, rottweilers, and their mixes count for between half to three-fourths of all dog bites. Two-thirds of those are the FIRST time for the animal to show this type of aggressive behavior. With these stats, you have to see how people are ready to "profile" pit bulls! There is good reason for doing so.

mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 7:37pm.

Cart path encounters need to end with a dead predator - looter or pit bull, does not matter which one.
I carry when I'm on the cart paths and have done so for 10 years and not once have I pulled the Beretta out of the fanny pack. I thought about it when I saw David's Mom walking the other day (no just kidding, doll face) but I never had a real reason to draw the weapon.

However, if I see a charging pit bull ---bang, bang he/she/it be a dead dog.


bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 7:43pm.

I agree with mudcat.


Submitted by PTC Observer on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 6:27pm.

Why don’t we simply hold the owners of the pit bull accountable? What if a toy poodle hurt my daughter would we pass a law concerning poodles? Why do we have to pass a law every time some idiot does something irresponsible? I certainly side with the gentleman that was injured in this incident, but I don’t think we need yet another law.

If someone is killed by a dog then under Georgia law then the owner would be charged with manslaughter. If someone is injured then owners can be sued for negligence and the extent of the injuries and remedy balanced by the court.

Let the courts decide and stop creating more laws that we don’t need.

And no, I don't own a pit bull.

Submitted by MYTMITE on Sat, 11/14/2009 - 1:41am.

attack, you can not get their jaws off their prey. I am sure there are many wonderful pits but, sad to say, there have been cases where the gentlest, sweetest pit bull turned on it's owner and tore them up. They can really do damage especially to children or older defenseless people. I don't believe we should go to the extremes listed by the gentleman but there should be some control---be on a leash, be able to control the animal on a leash, never let it run loose, and always have it in a fenced-in yard when not with you on a leash. If you can't control the size and strength of the dog you should not have it.

Submitted by RKS on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 7:32pm.

Actually, it's not true that you cannot get their jaws apart...that's an urban legend. The problem of “dangerous dogs” will not be remedied by the “quick fix” of breed-specific laws. There is no evidence that breed-specific laws — which are costly and difficult to enforce — make communities safer for human families or for the companion animals who are a part of so many households. And it turns out, such laws also have negative and wholly unintended consequences. Who is going to pay for the County to "police" the bully breed dogs? The Shelter is already overworked and they are not equipped to make sure the county does not have any bully breed dogs. A task force formed in 2003 to study the effectiveness of the Prince George’s County, Maryland, pit bull ban estimated that the county spends more than $250,000 each year to enforce the ban. Further, in a report to the County Council, the task force noted that “public safety is not improved as a result of [the ban],” and that “there is no transgression committed by owner or animal that is not covered by another, non-breed specific portion of the Animal Control Code (i.e., vicious animal, nuisance animal, leash laws).” The task force recommended that Prince George’s County repeal the ban. (this information taken from the ASPCA website).

I think we need to ban stupid people, not their dogs.

Submitted by Bonkers on Tue, 11/17/2009 - 6:28am.

If cats were going around scratching up kids badly and biting adults, we would shoot them all immediately, or when ever we saw one loose.
They do enough damage to my car hoods and flower pots now. They love to eat baby birds trying to learn how to fly also.

The point is that we have insufficient control of animals in dense neighborhoods. Just to say it is a person's fault is like saying wars are people's fault.
It doesn't solve or improve the situation.

I suggest that every time we run up on a bunch of stupid drunks fighting dogs in a pen, that we send all of the adults to that empty prison in Thomson, Illinois for five years---no probation. Or to the criminal hospital for the insane!

Give the dogs big doses of Prozac.

bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 7:40pm.

until it's your six year old that gets attacked by one.

Are you really going to sit there and tell me you'll be happy with whatever the courts decide then?


Submitted by PTC Observer on Sat, 11/14/2009 - 9:54am.

Unless and until people, not dogs, take personal responsibility, then all we will have is just pack of rules, laws, and regulations. No society can survive without each person taking personal responsibility for his or her own actions. No nanny state can save us from idiots.

As to what I would do if a loose dog hurt my six-year-old girl, I would decide what to do after I put neat bullet through the dog's head. Then I would go after the owner legally. He could sue me for killing his dog. I would let the court decide both separate cases.

If people want to own a dangerous breed, then they will have to take the risk of owning them. "sweet dogs" don't turn on their masters.

Submitted by PS1441 on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 7:36pm.

"I was in fear for my own life, or that of another"

matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 6:25pm.

Remember the movie "The Great Outdoors", Mr. Brown reminds me of the guy that keep getting struck by lightening.


Submitted by PS1441 on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 7:39pm.

Guy is like a magnet for vicious dogs.
Does he make victim noises or something?
Carrying raw hamburger in his pockets?

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 8:03am.

How many times has it been, Reg?

"S-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-sixty-six times"


Submitted by Bonkers on Sun, 11/15/2009 - 8:43am.

Joke:
Mary Jane: "whuuuuuuaaatt tititime isizis iit, sir?

Doofus: says nothing!

Mary Jane: repeats her question, "whuuuuuuuaaatttititme isizis iit, Mister(loudly)

Doofus: says nothing!

Bystander, aggravated: "Mister, why won't you tell that poor woman what time it is?"

Doofus: Whhhuuuut, uhanuhan ggitt thuuhuh tttttaaaar ssssssslapppped outttnn me!"

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.